Skip to main content

The darker side of male bonding...

Such coincidence that my last topic here became the reason for a very disturbed friend to rant about!!! Her colleagues in a pre-dominated male setup were making her feel excluded... and she was convinced it was because she is a woman and doesnt do the 'male bonding' bits!

The same bonding mechanisms - after-hours drinking, bitching about women colleagues - kind of by their own nature mostly exclude a married mom who also wants to do a fair job at work. Couple it with the fact that this friend is not from the top-most premier mgmt college and is yet at par with some men who are (and are her 'seniors' by a few batches!). She is convinced that this has contributed a fair bit towards providing some more fodder for the discrimination she feels she's going through.

But would all this justify the behavior of these few 'good' men? Is it ok to behave in a fashion which just comes naturally to them? Is it really needed that they feel more responsible for their actions vis-a-vis the impact that it may have on their colleague? are they even doing anything wrong - professionally or even ethically?

I was trying to persuade her to disassociate between the normal professional rivalry thats bound to happen when a 'junior' becomes a peer... and the fact that she's the only woman at that level. However she felt that since her junior 'men' were very much a part of this entire club-behavior... it didnt have that much to do with her seniority as much as with her being a woman (not because she was capable, but becoz she's a girl!!)

Am left feeling both disgusted and yet also with a curious little amount of sympathy for those men. I mean - men have enough reasons to feel threatened in their erstwhile unilateral stronghold areas (eg. homes!!) ... now facing this kind of competition from women at work - ALL the time - cant be easy.

But i must end with saying that my inherent positivity makes me feel that there just might be another reason for this kind of a behavior - and not just chauvinism...

anyone with any clues... pls help!! its a career at stake here...

Comments

deepu said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
deepu said…
I am not sure whether the clues which i am writing here applies to the person you are talking to , but in general from what ever i have seen , some reasons for this might be

a) men are often interested in
activities or topics that women tend not to relate to.

b)the percentage of males in our offices are often high, men tend to dominate non-academic discussions with topics of interest to them.

c)In the female culture, the relationship, the connectedness, the rapport is ultimately the most important thing and all these things mentioned above might be insignificant or not priority for male employees. . They will discuss right from mallika sheravat to Obama in a span of 5 mins even though they are meeting for the first time in their life.

Signing off as the comment is becoming another blog:))

Popular posts from this blog

Reading is what saved me…

  Its funny to say or hear this but its true. In my life, books happened very early on in life and I got totally hooked to the escape they offered. Given our financial constraints growing up, books were a cheap way to get those kicks in life. A nearby renting library with an endless supply of M&Bs and Georgette Heyer’s and other similar ‘fluffy’ fiction – made it all super easy. I devoured books from the school library, shamelessly borrowed (and returned) books from friends and neighbors and never shied away from being seen with a book at the every juncture. Its truly a wonder that i didn' t get glasses at that stage in life! Books saved me from the stress that financial constraints bring to a child’s mind. Books saved me from the boredom that brings on negative thinking. Books told me that having and expressing emotions were totally fine – I could shed copious tears while reading without any fear of judgement. I could laugh out loud at a smart and sassy scene. Instead they...

F$#@ Buddies

When I first heard this term – in all my naivety (yes it DOES apply to me at times!!) – I really thought it means its someone who’s a buddy and you also f@#$ them… seemed to make little sense to me at that time – simply because I thought that’s what I define as my perfect formula for a life partner!! Why coin a whole new term for something as basic as say a soul mate etc… Only later did I finally grow up to realize that there’s a whole new world out there in which terms like this make so much sense… and its not what I thought… Its someone who u f@#$ and can be sure to keep it a secret like a buddy!!! Or it’s a buddy - who when u’re down and out, you can ask for a f@#$ if you really need it!! Now why did this come to mind now… well simply becoz in a recent episode of ‘sex and the city’ – the girls are discussing this! And I was wondering about this kind of relationships – if they can be called that. Especially so in our culture here - where most people in my circle at least (or so i wud...

For Ruaan.. 9th October 2014

Hello cheeku… You’re truly becoming a ‘BIG’ boy now. Its such a delight to have you around me – at most times! :P From the last year to now – soooooo much has changed in our lives together. You go to a day care now for a few hours, have made your own friends there that your mamma knows nothing about, have your own schedules and even look forward to your life away from home and us I guess. But the one thing that has remained the same or maybe only increased is how much I adore you. Totally. Simply. Madly. Deeply. Wholeheartedly. Unequivocally. Selfishly. Selflessly. I think you’re the best kid God could have sent down for me. You’re soo much like me and yet in so many ways so different. I love the way you’re so loving towards everyone… you’re not a naturally aggressive person (so far!). And yet your boundless energy and especially your love for sports I am sure comes from your dad totally. Its such a good blend to have – I just hope we’re able to nurture it in you for a lon...